Martin Luther King’s Good Friday 60 Years Ago
National Catholic Register, 07 April 2023
1963’s ‘Letter From Birmingham Jail,’ for all its legal and political significance, remains a profoundly religious text, a jailed pastor writing to fellow pastors.
“Never before have I written so long a letter,” wrote Martin Luther King 60 years ago this Easter. “I can assure you that it would have been much shorter if I had been writing from a comfortable desk, but what else can one do when he is alone in a narrow jail cell, other than write long letters, think long thoughts and pray long prayers?”
Good Friday in Jail
In April 1963, King went to Alabama to lead nonviolent action in one of America’s most fiercely segregated cities. He was arrested — protesting without a “permit” — in Birmingham on Good Friday and thrown in the city jail. He spent that Easter writing amid the harsh conditions of the jail rather than preaching in his pulpit.
On its 60th anniversary it remains a precious testament of pastoral witness, written by a pastor oppressed by an unjust regime to other pastors who took issue with King’s involvement, tactics and timetable.
The nearly 7,000 words of the Letter From Birmingham Jail form the most important written document of the civil rights movement, one of the most important texts in American political history, and were of global importance in articulating why unjust laws are laws that call for civil disobedience.
Augustine and Aquinas on Law
The heart of the letter is King’s drawing upon the Catholic tradition of law.
“There are two types of laws: just and unjust,” King wrote. “I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that ‘an unjust law is no law at all.’”
Civil disobedience, King argued, does not lead to anarchy as his critics claimed, but to a deeper respect for justice, which is supposed to be the purpose of law.
“What is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust?” King wrote:
“A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority.”
A Preacher in Prison
Yet King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail, for all its legal and political import, remains a religious text, a jailed pastor writing to fellow pastors, some of whom have taken the side of his jailers. It is a profoundly biblical text, as one would expect from a Baptist preacher, and a profoundly ecclesial one, dealing with corruption and compromised witness in the Christian Church.
“I am in Birmingham because injustice is here,” wrote King to Christian clergymen who object to his presence, placing himself in the biblical prophetic tradition:
“Just as the prophets of the eighth century B.C. left their villages and carried their ‘thus saith the Lord’ far beyond the boundaries of their home towns, and just as the Apostle Paul left his village of Tarsus and carried the gospel of Jesus Christ to the far corners of the Greco Roman world, so am I compelled to carry the gospel of freedom beyond my own home town. Like Paul, I must constantly respond to the Macedonian call for aid.”
That the last of the prophets, John the Baptist, was clapped into prison by Herod did not need mentioning. King then continued with some of his most famous words.
“I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”
King rejected the Alabama clergy’s argument that it would be better to wait for a more convenient time:
“Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct action campaign that was ‘well timed’ in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word ‘Wait!’ It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This ‘Wait’ has almost always meant ‘Never.’”
King appealed to the Bible, claiming that “civil disobedience” has its roots “sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, on the ground that a higher moral law was at stake.”
Such disobedience “was practiced superbly by the early Christians, who were willing to face hungry lions and the excruciating pain of chopping blocks rather than submit to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire.”
A Failure of the Church
Confessing his disappointment with anemic support from the “white moderate,” King laments that “shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”
Weak political allies do not frustrate King as much as other Christian leaders. He acknowledges that he has support, and even mentions the desegregation of a Catholic institution, Spring Hill College in Alabama. But his disappointment with his fellow clergy is deep.
“You speak of our activity in Birmingham as extreme,” King writes, in a forthright challenge to the Church:
But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label.
Was not Jesus an extremist for love: Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.
Was not Amos an extremist for justice: Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream.
Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel: I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.
Continue reading at the National Catholic Register.