Israel is building a new Middle East — one that counters Iranian threat
National Post, 6 October 2024
A history of short wars and long consequences
The history of the modern state of Israel is one of short wars with long consequences. For the first fifty years or so, until the millennium, that worked out largely to Israel’s benefit.
In the year since the brutal attacks — replete with cold-blooded murder, rape and hostage-taking — by Hamas, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has tried to wring long consequences from the wars against Hamas, Hezbollah and possibly Iran.
This column argued last month that the strategic priority for Israel should be the expansion of the Abraham Accords; the creation of a new Middle East in which Israel and its Arab neighbours, including Saudi Arabia, would be able to contain Iran and its proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah, and find some sort of workable governance solution for Gaza and the West Bank. It was the vision that Netanyahu presented at the United Nations just weeks before the Hamas attacks.
The Israeli government, in the recent attacks on Hezbollah, has taken a different approach. Netanyahu’s government is seeking to contain Iran and its proxies on its own by force. If that is successful, it is reasonable to expect that Iran’s Arab neighbours would be grateful for Israel degrading the Iranian threat. That thinking appeals to Israel’s history of short wars with long consequences.
Israel was attacked at its birth by its Arab neighbours. Israel prevailed in that initial war, 1947-48, and enlarged its frontiers. The initial UN plan for Israel put the new state in precarious borders. The war resulted in a larger Israel, more defensible. The Arab powers would have been better off if they had agreed to the original UN plan, as Israel had done.
Then came the Suez crisis of 1956. Israel took the Sinai Peninsula, but was forced to withdraw by the Americans. Nevertheless, the war resulted in the opening of the Straits of Tiran between Sinai and Saudi Arabia, a critical strategic gain for Israel.
The Six-Day War in 1967 was a triumph of biblical proportions for Israel, vanquishing Egypt, Syria and Jordan, and taking Sinai, Gaza, West Bank, Golan Heights and East Jerusalem, including the Old City. Israel had never controlled more territory, or been more secure.
Too powerful perhaps, as the triumph of 1967 led a significant number of Israelis to dream of a greater Israel. Perpetual rule over Palestinians would be the price of that.
In 1973, Egypt and Syria attacked on Yom Kippur and came close to victory in the initial days of surprise and shock. (The Hamas attacks last year were timed to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War.) Israel rallied and repelled the Egyptians.
The aftermath of the war marked an earthquake in Israel. Prime Minister Golda Meir was gone in 1974, and the long-ruling Labour Party was defeated in 1977. In 1979, then Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, the same who launched the attack on Yom Kippur, made peace with Israel, a peace that has endured forty-five years.
Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to eject the Palestine Liberation Organization of Yasser Arafat. Israel got the PLO out, but ended up staying itself, a long and costly fight that did not end until 2000. The northern border was secure.
The Gulf War of 1991 to eject Saddam Hussein from Kuwait did not engage Israeli forces, but it changed the regional dynamics. The PLO had backed Saddam, angering the Saudis and the Gulf states, and when he was defeated, the Palestinians were in a weak position. The 1993 Oslo Accords followed. The PLO would recognize Israel and accept partial sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza. An Israeli-Jordan peace treaty would follow in 1994.
The short-war-long-consequence pattern delivered an Israel at peace with its neighbours, secure in expanded borders and with an apparently feasible solution to the Palestinian question.
Continue reading at the National Post.