Elon Musk's unglorious moment
National Post, 11 October 2026
Fresh off his quest to cut aid to the poorest people in the world, he's now taking aim at Canadian Confederation
Even for the world’s premiere celebrity entrepreneur, Elon Musk is having something of a moment.
He was on the cover The Economist’s special summer issue over the headline, “Should you be afraid of Elon Musk?”
When U.S. President Donald Trump invited the would-be, perhaps-already-are, gods of artificial intelligence to the White House, Musk was seated directly at the president’s side. The convened tech titans signed a “morally binding” declaration to use, more or less, AI for good things, not bad.
To have Trump preside over the making of moral commitments showed something of a sense of humour. To rely on the moral commitments of the same people who have devoted impressive ingenuity and massive marketing into products that intentionally seek to addict their customers, including children, is less funny.
Days had barely passed before Musk was appointed by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to a three-person panel to advise on autonomous weapons. Perhaps the moral commitment to use AI for good includes permitting AI agents to choose and destroy targets — to kill on their own.
Then Musk offered his views on Canadian Confederation, namely that there should be much less of it. Quebec, Alberta and Saskatchewan were advised to separate. That would leave an odd-looking Canada, but perhaps then Ontario would separate from it, too.
Musk, it should be noted, knows something about Ontario, having lived in Kingston for two years. A decade or so ago, Queen’s University was rather more bullish on promoting its quondam student than it is now. I learned recently from an old alumni magazine that Musk and I arrived on campus together in September 1989 as undergraduates. We apparently lived in the same residence, Victoria Hall. It was a big residence, more than 800 students. I don’t recall ever meeting him. In any case, after two years Musk was off to the Ivy League.
He may continue to pay attention to Canada, as a good number of the 14 children he has fathered with several women are Canadian citizens. Their names alone — X Æ A-Xii, Techno Mechanicus, Seldon Lycurgus — suggest grounds for questioning his non-engineering, non-entrepreneurial judgment.
There is much to admire in the visionary engineer and daring entrepreneur. It is well established that he sees what other do not, and makes happen what others cannot. The adjective “unique” is rarely employed accurately; Musk may well be just that.
At least he managed to convince his board of directors that he is exactly such, unique in that he is utterly irreplaceable. For him, they crafted a trillion-dollar compensation package, making him unique in that regard, too — the world’s only trillionaire. His worth is so great that it now measures half of the annual deficit of the American federal government.
Which is relevant, in that before signing on to Trump’s moral pact, and advising the Pentagon, Musk did a few months of government service last year at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). He promised to find some $2 trillion in savings; after a few months his service wrapped up with estimates that DOGE achieved something on the order of $60 billion to $160 billion in savings. Not nothing — the Pentagon may need that much just to rebuild the military bases it lost during the Iran war.
There is much debate over what DOGE achieved, and Trump administration claims are worth whatever credibility the Trump administration has. What is not in dispute is that Musk and DOGE had one singular so-called success: the shuttering of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
Continue reading at the National Post.