Sapieha’s Dinner and the Heavenly Banquet

The Catholic Thing, 1 November 2026

Archbishop Sapieha’s heroic witness shaped St. John Paul II's legacy of moral courage and the promise of divine mercy.

Given his decisive role in my priestly vocation, I pay particular attention to the anniversaries of St. John Paul the Great. We ought to call him that, as both his immediate successors argued, Pope Benedict XVI explicitly and Pope Francis implicitly.

This year’s solemn feast of All Saints marks the eightieth anniversary of John Paul’s priestly ordination, conferred by Cardinal Adam Sapieha in the chapel of the venerable residence of the Cracovian archbishops. Thirty years ago, for his golden jubilee, John Paul published a small book for the occasion, Gift and Mystery, which remains a fine gift for any priest or seminarian.

It was on his feast day – October 22, the date of his stirring “Be Not Afraid” homily at the inauguration of his pontificate – that a dozen American bishops were enticed to the White House with promises of meeting Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, both Catholics. It was misleading from the outset – Vance was in Nebraska and Rubio in India – and ended in manipulation, with the White House ambushing the bishops with an Oval Office audience, during which they were filmed hovering in prayer over the president.

It’s impossible to control such things in an away game, as it were. Benedict XVI refused to allow himself to be photographed with Nancy Pelosi on one occasion, but he was in his own Vatican ballpark. But the liturgical recurrence brought to mind one of the more vivid images of John Paul’s many meetings with civil leaders.

In 1983, John Paul returned to Poland for the second time. His homeland was under martial law, declared by Moscow’s man in Warsaw, General Wojciech Jaruzelski. When the two met at the presidential palace to exchange formal addresses, John Paul was somber and serene. Jaruzelski, to the astonishment of the assembled entourages and noted by the journalists present, was shaking. Not metaphorically. His hands trembled, his knees knocked. He was afraid.

Beholding that pathetic sight, a man of great moral weakness wrapped in political power, I suspect that John Paul’s thoughts might have gone back to the “unbroken prince,” the “archbishop of the long night of occupation,” Adam Sapieha. For forty years (1911 – 1951) as archbishop of Kraków, he witnessed more blood spilled than any bishop in the history of the Church. Two world wars unfolded on his territory, which included Auschwitz.

While the influence of Poland’s “primate of the millennium,” Blessed Stefan Wyszynski, on John Paul is widely known, it is Sapieha who had the greater formative impact.

George Weigel’s biography, Witness to Hope, opens with dramatic scenes that marked Karol Wojtyła’s young years in Kraków. Amongst them is included one of the great dinners in the thousand-year history of Poland. Soon after the German-Soviet dismemberment of Poland in 1939, the Nazis installed Hans Frank as “governor general” in Kraków. The gangster took up residence in Wawel Castle, the ancient seat of Polish kings.

Weigel writes that Frank, “evidently looking for some sliver of legitimation, hinted repeatedly that an invitation to dinner at the archbishop’s residence would be well-received.”

Sapieha issued the invitation and seated Frank at the other end of his formal table. He then served him, on the silver plate of the prelate’s patrimony, “the people’s diet of stale bread and ersatz coffee.” The prince-archbishop knew his people’s suffering. He thought that Frank should know it too. Years later, John Paul would remind Jaruzelski of the same.

It was in that same residence that Wojtyła completed his studies for ordination, in the clandestine seminary that Sapieha operated in his own home. It was there that he learned firsthand the lessons first taught in Kraków by the martyr-bishop St. Stanislaus nearly 900 years earlier. When John Paul stood quietly before a quaking Jaruzelski, it was Sapieha’s formation bearing fruit.

And what was Sapieha thinking that morning of All Saints in 1946? Perhaps that the young man he was about to ordain had a singular future for Kraków? Perhaps might he have been thinking about that dinner with Frank in that very building.

Continue reading at The Catholic Thing.