The First, Second, and Third Rome – in Paris

The Catholic Thing, 27 June 2026

Patriarch Bartholomew 's assumption of Pope Benedict XVI's academic seat in Paris highlights the enduring spiritual bond between Rome and Constantinople.

The Cardinals attending the extraordinary consistory in Rome will depart today, just as the customary delegation from the Patriarchate of Constantinople arrives for the solemn feast of Peter and Paul. 

It’s an annual fraternal custom. A delegation from Rome visits Constantinople for the feast of St. Andrew on November 30th. Last year, Pope Leo XIV led the delegation personally in the context of the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea. On June 29th, the Successor of Andrew sends representatives to the Successor of Peter.

The Year of Our Lord 2026 included a unique moment in the warm relations between Rome and Constantinople under Patriarch Bartholomew, now the longest-serving Patriarch of Constantinople in history. His thirty-fifth anniversary falls this October.

Visits of Andrew to Peter are now routine. But three months ago, something unique took place. Bartholomew took the seat of Benedict. 

The Institut de France is itself a unique entity, intended to be something of a repository and custodian of French culture. It houses five prestigious academies for scholars, scientists, writers, and artists, analogous to the Royal Societies found in Commonwealth countries, or the pontifical academies in Rome. It is more central to the intellectual culture of France than those analogues, though. 

One of the academies is that of Moral and Political Sciences, which includes foreign associate members. 

When invited to join, a new member is assigned a specific “seat,” which is held for life. Upon admission, the new academician is invited to give an address that, by custom, includes a eulogy for the previous holder of that seat. This year, Patriarch Bartholomew was admitted to the seat previously occupied by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger since 1992 and held until his death on the final day of 2022.

“It reveals not only the continuity of an academic tradition, but also the spiritual bond between Rome and Constantinople – between Old and New Rome,” Bartholomew noted.

The seat that passed from Benedict to Bartholomew is a noble one; Ratzinger’s predecessor was the great Russian scientist, dissident, and witness of conscience, Andrei Sakharov.

There is more than some sadness in that sequence today. The seat occupied by the bishop of the First Rome and now the Second Rome was held before them by a Russian. Today, the bishop of the Third Rome – Patriarch Kirill of Moscow – is no longer in communion with Bartholomew. In blessing the war of Vladimir Putin against Ukraine, in which Orthodox Christians are killing each other within the very same flock over which Kirill presides, the Patriarch of Moscow has become a counter-witness to the Gospel. It is a long way down from Sakharov, the conscience of Russia, to Kirill, the corrupter of the Russian conscience.

In his 1992 address eulogizing Sakharov, Ratzinger noted that after 1968 the Soviet regime excluded the physicist from work related to state secrets. Thus marginalized, “from that time onward his mind focused on the question of human rights, on the moral renewal of the country and of humanity, and more generally on universal human values and the demands of conscience.”

“He who so loved his country had to become the accuser of a regime that was pushing people into apathy, weariness, indifference, that was causing them to fall prey to external and internal misery.” Ratzinger continued: 

One could say, of course, that with the fall of the communist system Sakharov’s mission has been fulfilled; that it was an important chapter of history which is now part of the past. I think that reasoning in this way would be a grave and dangerous error. First of all, it is clear that the general orientation of Sakharov’s thinking regards human dignity and human rights. Obedience to conscience, even at the cost of suffering, is a message which loses nothing of its relevance even when the political context in which this message had acquired its special relevance no longer exists.

Today in Russia, officials in both church and state face a struggle of conscience under the leadership of Putin and Kirill.

Continue reading at The Catholic Thing.